indianz.com Fredericks Peebles & Morgan LLP
Advertise on Indianz.Com
Home Whats New on Indianz.Com? News Forums
Home > News > Headlines
Print   Subscribe
Opinion: Quechan Nation faces media criticism for energy lawsuit
Monday, January 31, 2011
Filed Under: Opinion

"Recently, Native American tribes’ opposition to solar projects has been well – although inaccurately – documented. The media coverage is the result of a San Diego Federal District Court’s decision[1] where the Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation (Quechan) sought and successfully obtained an injunction against the US Department of Interior's (DOI) approval of a 709-megawatt solar farm planned for more than 6,000 acres of public land in the desert in California’s Imperial valley. If built, the project would have been one of the largest solar facilities in the Nation. Today, the “Imperial project” is dead in the water.

A storm of media criticism has been levied upon the Quechan for not “supporting” the project. After all, as stewards of the earth, Indians are supposed to love alternative energy, right? Some commentators[2] have used the fact that the tribe’s casino uses traditional energy to vilify the tribe’s environmental record. One article in the Solar Home & Business Journal,[3] suggested that the tribe does not actually care about its cultural resources, as the site of their “casino was considered sacred and contained precious cultural artifacts” but the “[b]ulldozers ‘roared into action’ despite the elders’ objections . . . .” Other coverage appears to be more evenhanded. A recent article in the San Diego Daily Transcript[4] characterized the Quechan suit as “clearly epitomiz[ing] how the conflicting priorities of ancient tradition and modern urgent necessity are juxtaposed.” Ultimately, that author concluded that his “sympathies are divided between the legitimate needs of the tribes” to preserve their ancient sites and artifacts “and the imperative to quickly respond to climate change.”

These analysis are over-simplified and create a false dichotomy that has nothing to do with the issues involved in the Quechan suit.

The lands at issue in Quechan involved public lands managed by the BLM, containing an estimated 459 “cultural resources,” many of which were of significance to the tribe. All parties agreed that the cultural resources were legitimate, and that the lands had a “history of extensive use by Native American groups.” The tribe’s complaint alleged that the BLM “reached its approval decision prior to evaluating the eligibility of cultural resources identified in the project area and without engaging required consultation with tribes” pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, the National Environmental Protection Act, and various other procedural laws."

Get the Story:
Ryan D. Dreveskracht: Enlightening Quechan Tribe v. U.S. Department of Interior (The Native American Times 1/31)

Related Stories:
Opinion: Tribes in California embracing renewable energy solutions (1/27)
Opinion: Tribes should be included in renewable energy solutions (1/14)
Quechan Nation wins ruling in case against solar power project (12/17)
Quechan Nation elders stage protest against solar energy plant (11/16)
Quechan Nation elders upset by approval of solar power project (11/15)
Blog: Quechan Nation faces uphill battle in lawsuit over solar farm (11/04)
Quechan Nation wants federal judge to block solar energy project (11/3)
Tribal members worried about fast-tracking of energy projects (10/20)



Copyright © Indianz.Com
More headlines...
Local Links:
In The Hoop | Indian Gaming | The Federal Register
Casino Stalker | Federal Recognition Database
Job Links:
Winnebago Tribe Chief Financial Officer
Contact Blue Earth Marketing, lchen@blueearthmarketing.com, to place your ad here!
Latest News:
Former Soboba Band chairman sentenced in bribery case (4/19)
Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe closes a part of lake to visitors (4/19)
Pointe Au Chien Tribe sues BP over Gulf of Mexico oil spill (4/19)
Shinnecock Nation could pay $120M for land in casino deal (4/19)
Charles Trimble: Lakota popcorn and other Sioux subjects (4/18)
Mark Trahant: Some tall tales about taxes in United States (4/18)
Vi Waln: Educator Myrl Smith fell in love with his students (4/18)
Wambli Sina Win: Eagle feathers being robbed of meaning (4/18)
Letter: Cobell settlement isn't 'stalled' over attorney fees (4/18)
Senate Indian Affairs Committee roundtable on education (4/18)
Timothy Purdon: Stopping violence against Indian women (4/18)
Marc Simmons: Spanish governor improved tribal relations (4/18)
Supreme Court won't hear Winnemucca leadership dispute (4/18)
School district fights San Pasqual Band land-into-trust bid (4/18)
United National Indian Tribal Youth observes 35th birthday (4/18)
Menominee Nation chairman works to keep language alive (4/18)
USDA awards $1M to tribes for nutrition education projects (4/18)
Travel: Powwows.com shares top events in Indian Country (4/18)
Editorial: Rethink national sex offender registration system (4/18)
Opinion: Aboriginals are Australia's forgotten war veterans (4/18)
Oklahoma tribes share $118M in casino revenue with state (4/18)
Editorial: Jemez off-reservation casino deserves a chance (4/18)
Column: Bay Mills chair eyes a new off-reservation casino (4/18)
Editorial: Pechanga Band's moral obligation in casino deal (4/18)
Shinnecock Nation close to deal for casino on Long Island (4/18)
Meskwaki Tribe sued for withholding per capita payments (4/18)
Tex Hall: US helped tribes with broken treaties, promises (4/15)
Opinion: European descendants are the real Indian givers (4/15)
more headlines...

Home | Abramoff | Arts & Entertainment | Business | Canada | Cobell | Education | Environment | Forum | Health | Humor | Indian Gaming | Jobs | Law | National | News | Opinion | Politics | Recognition | Sports | Trust

Suggest a Site

Indianz.Com Terms of Service | Indianz.Com Privacy Policy
About Indianz.Com | Contribute to Indianz.Com | Advertise on Indianz.Com | Write to Indianz.Com

Indianz.Com is a product of Noble Savage Media, LLC and Ho-Chunk, Inc.